Why should anyone be concerned with the idea of population control in today’s increasingly crowded world? The earth will soon pass seven billion people and the number of people born into poverty is set to rise. Increasingly the idea of controlling the world’s population through non-coercive means is a topic of debate in the world’s capitals. Should we be concerned? Should anyone be concerned with the idea of population control as it is debated in our newspapers and magazines and TV shows?
What is population control?
Population control is any methodology used to control the type, location and number of people that inhabit the earth. Public debate is strictly limited however to non-coercive means in achieving any one of these goals, especially with regards to population reduction. An important example of this would be allowing people the free choice on procreative matters. By using various methodologies both economic and administrative and educational to dissuade people from having more children than needed, a stable population base can be created. It should be noted here that the prevailing viewpoint of the world’s decision makers is that Population control and environmental devastation are linked and the former contributes heavily to the latter. This view is foundational to understand the policies that are formulated to combat, what is viewed by policy makers as a runaway population explosion. Indeed, when the Nation Intelligence Council (NIC) held their Global Trends Conference they identified seven key drivers that would shape the globe through the year 2015. The first was demographics; the second was natural resources and environment.[i] These trends are of the utmost importance to understand if we are to understand the motives and policies that are driving the population control agenda. Related terms and policy paradigms and nomenclature are 'Sustainable Development', 'Agenda 21', ‘Rio Conference’ ‘Biodiversity Treaty’, ‘Bioshpere Reserves’, ‘World Heritage Treaty’, ‘Ecosystem Management’, ‘Desertification Treaty’, Ecosystem Management etc. The idea that there are too many people inhabiting the earth is one that is ingrained in the world’s leaders and one that, in their view, requires a solution.
What kinds of solutions?
The only socially and psychologically acceptable solution available to policy makers when discussing reducing the world’s population is education. While other methods are debated they are rarely employed or even discussed with any real publicity. These include various methods of taxation and other forms of financial disincentives. These methods are important to note because barring success of the educational solution track, the financial/administrative[ii] disincentives administrative will probably become more likely as a method of reducing populations. However, this method is only really available where there is some degree of wealth and a fairly well developed governmental institutions capable of enforcing such a regimen. These are the regions that are the primary target of the so called population control agenda; remote, poor, economically underdeveloped regions of the world. Thus, if global policy makers are to have any success in their war on population (people), other methods must be employed.
Americans have truly been blessed. Many nations on Earth do not have enough food to feed their populations. However, recently the ability to increase food production is being hindered by bizarre weather patterns. In various regions on Earth, including in America, important food production areas are being challenged with floods. In other places, drought has been a serious problem. Unfortunately, though damaging as these natural disasters are, a more troubling danger contributing to world hunger is that of unequal distribution and shortages caused not by a lack of supply, but in unsold grain and food stocks that are kept off the market in order to keep the prices of grain high. Far from being a nefarious policy, this is done primarily to keep farmers in business. Despite the many advances, technologically speaking, in agricultural production techniques, hunger on a massive scale still exists in many parts of the world. The intervention of the world’s governments and by private institutions has been extensive and commendable. Nevertheless, large pockets of poverty and starvation remain in Portions of Asia, Africa, and Latin America.
Many of these trends have much of their roots in post-colonial economic and agricultural policies and others have their roots in mismanagement by many institutions that have ostensibly attempted to alleviate hunger and poverty in these regions. Falling commodity prices in the 1970’s and 1980’s did not help third world nations whose principle source of hard currency was through these same commodities. Many of these nations also carried large a foreign debt load. These debts could only be repaid with the earnings collected from those commodities, which were increasingly worth less, in monetary terms. While most of these nations learned to manage their debt to some degree, it often meant decreased living standards for much of the rest of the population in these nations. The lack of a coherent and successful policy in the 1970’s and 1980’s is leaving increasing problems in Africa in particular as it is one of the few region in the world where poverty, epidemics and ethnic violence are converging on a continent at the same time. Unfortunately where such misery exists there are always a few vile men who will attempt to exploit the situation for all its worth. Even using a starving means need to “influence” their “behavior”. Such moral perversity can be found in the United Nations food program.
“Food is power. We use it to change behavior, some may call it bribery. We do not apologize.”-Catherine Bertini, executive director of the U.N. World Food Program.
The idea in the minds of most people is that the UN is a benevolent organization who wishes only to help the helpless and bring peace to the world. I submit to you that it is not. While in the past the UN has helped some. It usually does so when the bright lights of publicity are shining and the CNN cameras are rolling. In reality, a review of the action of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) and to a lesser degree, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), all of which are associate agencies of the UN, have used their money creating authority to loan money to third world nations, at interest, ostensibly to help these countries with much needed development. Because these nations have only one thing the west wants, its natural resources (commodities), these nations once they default, become the economic vassals of the IMF and the World Bank. This is one of the reasons there are so many problems in Africa today. Despite the veiled attempts by the national establishment media to portray to the American people that Africa cannot take care of itself, often the real problem is the austerity measures which frequently take the form of price controls and currency devaluation’s which take an enormous toll on the general population in these struggling nations. Often the prognostications of the experts of these economic organizations deliberately overvalue the price of commodities produced by these developing nations thereby making them eligible for larger loan amounts. It has been argued back and forth by the banks supporters and detractors weather or not the World Bank is truly in business to help the poor nations out of their poverty, or simply an instrument for the rich nations to plunder the natural resources of the poor nations. It is a debate that will certainly continue, that is, until the remaining portions of that wealth is in the hands of the corporations and money-changers.
One of the first victims of this unseen war is the children of these nations. As living standards in these already poor nations’ declines, the children are often forced to work to help make ends meet in these families. Food becomes scarce as social conditions deteriorate. This often adds fuel to the fire of already tense ethnic tensions with violence the frequent result. The World Bank and the IMF are very much part of the problem in this region of the World. The most important reason these nefarious policies can continue is that, first, the mainstream media simply don’t report the facts to the American people and secondly, because most Americans are too busy to make more than a cursory look at these institutions and have no desire to look beyond the catch-all phrases to really care.
But today we do have some people who are attempting to sound the alarm bells. The turmoil in the Asian markets in late 1997 and 1998 showed an increasing debate as to the role of the international financial institutions. Hopefully, the debate will move into directions which will lead to reform of these institutions and a reduction in their role in profiting from human misery. It may also help alleviate the swirling mystery of how these institutions make some bizarre and at times abominable decisions, brought on by the World Bank’s obsession with secrecy. What are they doing with our taxpayer money that they don’t want anyone to know about? In this day and age, it would seem impossible to imagine a world without the likes of the money-changers. However, the use of debt to help out others is not a sound way to help thy neighbor. The use of other peoples money to loan out to basket case economies for private profit, lends itself to a very, dangerous and immoral situation which the people accept all too willingly, mostly out of abject ignorance
Unfortunately, there seems to be another purpose to the United Nations policy makers, which with a little investigation, reveals itself in the oft repeated slogan of population control. Population control is rooted in the idea that the world’s population is increasing too rapidly and is outstripping natural resources.
“We must speak far more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90 percent and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
These remarks were spoken by Dr. Sam Keen, a new age writer, at the 1996 Gorbachev conference in San Francisco. His remarked were received with warm applause, by the new “Intellectuals”. How he proposes to do away with 5 billion people was, of course, never discussed.
“My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT in hindsight is that it had greatly added to the population problem.”
This statement was made by Alexander King, president of the Club of Rome, a think tank for elitist and socialist ideas, which interlocks with the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission. Now according to the National Academy of Sciences, DDT had prevented 500 million deaths. Consequently, the Globalists set out to ban the use of DDT, not because it wasn’t effective or safe, but because it saved human lives. To these butchers, the preservation of human life is evil, letting hundreds of millions of people die is good.
Let us look at Africa, the Rwanda situation should have sent off alarm bells to the American people, unfortunately, during those massacres the WWF, and Bart Simpson were also on television, consequently, little attention was paid by the American masses. The Genocide first began in April of 1994. In the Early 1990’s the Hutu led military issued decrees disarming the largely Christian Tutsi’s. After the Tutsi’s were disarmed, the Hutu’s, using machetes massacred 800,000 Tutsi’s. Please take note, Madeline Albright[i] insisted the word Genocide not be used. This is because such a word must call for trials. American foreign policy did not want that to happen. One must wonder if the American foreign policy establishment really wanted the murder to come to an end before any neighboring African troops intervened, as American troops prevented others form entering in to render medical assistance to the sick and dying. Now the Hutu’s, after their faithful slaughter, has received millions of dollars in aid from no other source than the US Government. What is ignored is that fact the weapon of choice was the machete, a weapon easily outclassed by a simple machine gun. The argument that the safety of any intervening troops, the primary consideration for denying entry in to the ravaged areas, simply lacks credibility. The press, course, as the faithful and diligent defender of the elite, took its pre-scripted role of mute silence, was remiss in not explaining who and why no help was sent.
Time would fail me to discuss the effects on population that the HIV virus has had in Africa, where some of the infection rates in African militaries are over 75%. Whether you believe AIDS is man made or naturally occurring, the effects on population has been the same. Let me ask this question? Since when has having an incurable, contagious disease which just so happens to be transmitted through the act of reproduction (that is, making more people) been treated like a protected status, where some have even called for special rights? Has this helped curtail or spread the disease? Since when has our society shown such kindness on people whose illness is always fatal? Since when have our leaders been so quick to move to protect the homosexual population, (whose sexual activities coincidentally do not bring about procreation), while largely understating the effects of AIDS in Africa? One factor seems to be increasing clear, it is Africa that is the target. Resource rich, beautiful Africa, populated with what Margeret Sanger, the Founder of Planned Parenthood called, ‘human weeds’, that is, Black people[ii]. The Infamous Tuskeegee study is another interesting scene in the panorama of America’s medical experiments. Here black men were, after, being told they were being treated for their illness, (syphilis) were deliberately kept from medicines which would cure them, so that doctors could observe the effects of syphilis on men.
One must wonder when we will see crematoriums and gas chambers in America.
Let us consider the Abortion issue, once again it coincides completely with the population control agenda; the less people born the better. This form of murder seems far less objectionable to many Americans because the human life killed has no one to mourn for it, especially when its own mother is the butcher. When the abortion issue is raised, it is almost invariably raised in conjunction with the poor and yes, we have it again, black’s. The implication here is that ‘these people’, according to much of what we hear from many quarters, cannot control themselves, and if more of “them” are born it will just add to the burden of welfare and crime to our societies. Margaret Sanger who I mentioned before was the founder of Planned Parenthood, she organized the “Negro project” this was designed to eliminate what she believed to be an inferior race of people:
“The Masses of Negroes... particularly from the south, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among whites is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit.”- Margaret Sanger- The Negro Project[iii].
As you can see Planned Parenthood has some interesting beginnings that are not generally known, for obvious reasons.
Ms. Sanger also intended to hire some black ministers to propagandize for birth control.
“The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through Religious appeal. We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”- Margaret Sanger[iv]
Yes, the Ghost of Adolph Hitler is alive and well. It has been living in America for 50 some years, in the person of our Presidents[v], who support organizations such as Planned Parenthood[vi] and their Cabinets, many of our Doctors and Senators, in our corporate board rooms and in our living rooms, in our news rooms and in our schools. The American people are just like the Germans so many years ago, in denial. Until the stench of rotting corpses was unmistakable, most Germans were also in denial. Even then, most simply shut their eyes from seeing. Those that do see are cowering in the dark, knowing full well what awaits them if they speak out. A few are speaking out, but only a few, Americans may be able to hear them during a commercial break, while watching another inane sitcom or perhaps another sports extravaganza. That is provided, they aren’t doped up or drunk. Of course the infantile refrain is ‘you know, it can’t happen here, this is America!’ Of course ‘America’ is the magic word and all corruption and evil magically disappear when you say America!! And if you, as an American, really believe that, then you have definitely been watching too much T.V.!
Blood is crying from the ground, the desire of those who are formulating UN population policy have all made target estimates of 500 million to 3 billion people as the ideal population of Earth. Some have stated that it is imperative that this be accomplished, soon, by any available means.
"At present the population of the world is increasing ... War so far has had no great effect on this increase ... I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others ... If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full ... the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of others." - Bertrand Russell[vii]
Population control is a integral part of the Globalist agenda. One point that should be made here is that the Nazi's own population control agenda was formulated and executed with extreme secrecy. While the Jews of Germany were horribly persecuted and demonized by the state, the systematic extermination of the Jews was not a publicly announced policy. All notes of the Wannsee Conference, where the policy of extermination was planned and discussed, were to be burned and the topic of the conference was held in extreme secrecy. So consider this dear reader, while all the signs were present that this is what Hitler had planned for the Jews, the actual policy was carried out secretly. History is repeating itself today. Far too many suspicions diseases are being discovered and the deaths of far too many micro-biologists who work in genetics are happening to all be a just a 'coincidence'. Coincidence theorists are the ones who would stand by and watch the holocaust happen all over again while they cling to their religion of 'coincidental denial'[iv]. Today or at least very soon, it will be possible to create viruses that only kill certain races of people, thus using science (just like the Nazi's) to exterminate people with a high degree of secrecy. This will be a possibility that no one really will consider until great swaths of the human family have been wiped out by a few powerful and satanically inspired people. Secrecy will work greatly to the advantage of these evil men because anyone who speaks about it can be labeled a 'conspiracy nut' while the body bags are being filled. This is working now as a successful tact, as many much of the population of Africa has been decimated by AIDS and any who questions the suspicious causes of the disease, the extremely ineffective methods employed in combating it and the extreme pricing in medications is labeled a 'conspiracy nut' or a 'right wing wacko'. If indeed our policy makers wanted to solve the AIDS crisis, serious debate as to the causes of this dreadful disease should be explored without scientific or political prejudices. This has not only not happened, but woe to any suggest such a ‘unproductive’ course of action.
Another method of population control is through controlled migration. This is a method whereby large swaths of people are uprooted to new locations. This can be done by a variety of methods.
A: Economic: providing jobs and economic assistance to areas desirable for human migration.
B. War: Causing large scale military unrest where it is desired to have people migrate from such as regions rich in natural resources
C. Disease: Using disease or the fear of disease to encourage migration
D: Famine: Using famine as a means to induce people to migrate.
These and other methods can be used to control populations, not so much in a quantitative sense, but at least in terms of location. Highly concentrated populations are easier to control than widely dispersed ones and those with a rudimentary access to various forms of controlled media (electronic or print) tend to be somewhat more docile.
The CIA states clearly that the there are two forms of migration that will be most prevent in the coming years
· Urbanization – people moving to cities to find work, health and/or educational opportunities.
· Cross Border Migration – Moving from one nation-state to another.
It should be noted here that when the National Intelligence Council presented its Global Trends 2015, they noted that State actors would play a dormant role in many of the emerging changes and that other non-state actors would be more important in shaping the globe. This will be true in many respects as the international corporation, the terrorist and the banker are far more important to today’s global changes than Governments. The report went on to say that in the absence of a clear and overriding national security threat,
“United States will have difficulty drawing on its economic prowess to
advance its foreign policy agenda. The top priority of the American private
sector, which will be central to maintaining the US economic and
technological lead, will be financial profitability, not foreign policy objectives.”- Global Trends 2015
Here notice that the NIC realized the importance of the so-called ‘private sector’ (Corporations). So let it be noted here that these things are being discussed in antiseptically clean board rooms where the average American is not allowed entry or even invited to attend.
While this report certainly does not provide any solutions to these problems rest assured that if the problem has been identified, someone somewhere will be tasked to come up with solutions. What these solutions are or even the fact that they have been decided upon is rarely made public, though the funding for it will be footed by the taxpayer. Such a solution was sought by the US government back in the 1970’s. The Nixon administration with then secretary of State Henry Kissinger formulated a truly Malthusian policy of depopulation in National Security Action Memorandum 200. The US Government at the time considered the growing populations of the developing world as a grave threat to US national security. From then on a curious pattern begins to take shape. Indeed in the recent past, the deaths of many microbiologists is one that needs to be understood in light of the above memorandum and statements by our elite. Click Here (information is from www.copvcia.com and www.Rense.com )for some background information. Something most suspicious is going on and no one is speaking about it… at all. It is not unreasonable, despite how many talking heads on TV say it is, to question and follow up with more questions regarding these suspicious deaths. What is going on? Who is responsible and what is the ultimate aim?
Another more prevalent method of population control is through the use of technology. This is used for a variety of purposes, from crime prevention, monitoring and tracking and ultimately the total control of society. The American Total Information Awareness Office (TIA) is such an agency spawned out of the pit of hell. Headed by the convicted Felon, Admiral John Poindexter, who was later forced to resign over his ‘terrorism casino’ proposal (which provide a place where people could bet on future terrorist attacks), this office is bent on collecting, tracking and analyzing as much information of Americans as is technologically possible. The legal framework for the use of these new technologies has been codified in the US Patriot act. Ostensibly the act was to be used to stop terrorism, in reality in is becoming increasingly clear that the act was formulated long before the 911 attacks and was lying in wait just for such an attack to occur. Undermining the foundation principles of American Constitutional government is of extreme necessity in order to control populations. Using the technological advances of the recent past, controlling populations is front page news in most newspapers, from spy camera’s to microscopic electronic tags in clothing, from smart highways to computer spyware. These are all part of American life now, weather one is aware of these daily intrusions or not. Centralized planning for future population control technologies was imperative, the Soviet Union did it, the Nazi’s did it and now America is doing it, using as a catalyst, the TIA office. Such planning and the psychological preparations that go with it are necessary for a totalitarian state.
“When a society becomes increasingly totalitarian ("society", not "state"), it creates more and more difficulties of adaptation and requires its citizens to be conformist in the same degree. Thus, this technique becomes all the more necessary. I have no doubt that it makes men better balanced and “happier”. And there is the danger. It makes men happy in a milieu which normally would have made them unhappy, if they had not been worked, on, molded, and formed for just that milieu. What looks like the apex of humanism is in fact the pinnacle of human submission: children are educated to become precisely what society expects of them. They must have social consciences that allow them to strive for the same ends as society sets for itself. – Jacques Ellul[v]
Thus the preparatory psychological and legal frameworks have been set in order to provide our government and intelligentsia with the tools needed to control populations through technological means. At present these are conducted usually for the so called war on terrorism, a quaint euphemism that is increasing seen as a war on all kinds of political and economic dissent. The danger here for the intelligentsia is that once their usefulness is complete, they too become victims of the system that they helped create. This was true of Stalin’s regime and to a lesser degree, Hitler’s. Those at the pinnacle of such power historically have never been able to maintain that power without succumbing to varying degrees of paranoia. This paranoia dispenses with the threat, real, perceived and delusional with extreme methods. This is true today of in America, John Ashcroft and George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld have succumbed to this paranoia and are using every means at their disposal to counter the threat, as they perceive it. That threat is terrorism. However, just like in Stalin’s Russia, such a pathological view coupled with violent actions invariably breeds enemies that did not exist before, sowing the seeds of its own destruction. Thus, these technological methods that are today being employed with increasingly less crudeness are creating a vast cadre of resistance not only in the political arena, but also in the scientific community. The Federation of American Scientists exposes much government corruption and misuse of technology and makes their information available to all. This is just one group of America’s intelligentsia that have been useful to the system but are seeing the fruit of their labor used for purposes that are neither in the public interest nor in the long term interest of the nation.
Globalization has played an important role in population control insofar as this process is harmonizing legal, technological, economic and political frameworks for the coming global government. This process has neither been easy nor without major setbacks. Indeed it has been very difficult for global planners to get some of their agenda implemented because large segments of the population have become aware of the ‘agenda’ and are highly suspicious of the semi-secrecy with which these elitists work. A book could be written on this issue alone and indeed many have.
The world at large, unfortunately still has no clue as to the reasons and methods of the population control agenda and that it is one of the highest priorities of most of the world’s governments. Not just the Malthusian aspect, but every aspect of this agenda is important when governments formulate their policies, be it domestic or foreign. The bad news is the Children of God are even more clueless than the average American and work desperately hard to remain that way.
“My People are destroyed for a lack of Knowledge, because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee.” (Hosea 4:6a)
“For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these [are] the beginning of sorrows.”
The Bible teaches that a famine will come where food prices will increase dramatically, (Rev. 6:5-6) and economic conditions will worsen. It also teaches that large segments of the population will be killed via famine and diseases. The way of the last days economic system seems to one of cleansing. The Devil will be busy attempting to ‘cleanse’ the earth of Gods People (Rev 13:15) those who cannot buy or sell will face the very real prospect of starvation. Some may become homeless (no property taxes will be able to be paid no rent, etc.), there will be great pressure to acquiesce the new economic order. This system will be allowed to come into existence for a short time. (See Rev 17:10).
Disease and pestilence are coming. Population control of the most violent sort is coming, according the LORD Jesus Christ. I will not preach about this to any of you. Either you believe Jesus or you don’t.
Prepare for the worst, because it is surely coming.
By Mark S. Watson
[i] At that time US Ambassador to the UN.
[ii] In The Birth Control Review a publication Ms. Sanger Published, she praised the Nazi’s and the infanticide policies, which killed many babies that did not posses ‘Aryan’ features, and agreed with Hitler’s white supremacy.
[iii] The Negro Project is often put forward by Planned Parenthood’s defenders as beneficial to African Americans
[iv] Woman's Body, Woman's Right: Linda Gordon: New York: Penguin Press
[v] Many do not know that the American Government spirited out many Nazi’s and Nazi sympathizers after the war. America wanted access to the Intelligence networks the Nazi’s had as well as some of the Technology that was developed.
[vi] Planned Parenthood has become almost a staple and a potent symbol of the ‘new freedom’ that many Americans believe is a cornerstone of Americanism. I do not dispute this. In fact, is this type of freedom, without regard to life and personal responsibility that is turning this nation into a graveyard for millions of victims. Victims of this new ‘freedom’.
[vii] The Impact of Science on Society: Bertrand Russell
[i]CIA's Global Trends Report - Page 13
[ii]An example of an administrative disincentive would be losing any possibility of public housing or being forced into the worst kind of housing when on public assistance or being given the lowest priority with certain kinds of government benefits if one exceed a birth quota.
[iii] Named After Thomas Malthus, a British economist who wrote An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798), arguing that population tends to increase faster than food supply, with inevitably disastrous results, unless the increase in population is checked by moral restraints or by war, famine, and disease.
[iv] Coincidental Denialists believes that there are no conspiracies and no criminality can ever be ascribed to anyone inside government or America’s venerated institutions. It is an article of faith and just like many religions of the world, empirical evidence must be explained away in order to support the religious institution of Americanism. It is a religion that, through inaction and willful blindness, supports corruption at the highest levels and attacks proponents of other belief systems, such as those who have read history.
[v] The Technological Society, By Jaques Ellul, Vintage Books, 1964 – Page 348